The Origin Of Language Essay -- essays research papers fc

There has been considerable historical discourse over the nature of language. Most skin that thought and language are two interrelated criteria. Just how these criteria relate to the controversy over whether animals return language capabilities and even more specifically to the Sapir-Whorf benignant language thought debate, however, is not always clear. From a homosexual context we know that language is a acquisition which allows us to communicate our thoughts to others and in so doing to attain desired "biological, cognitive, and social/behavioral feedback" (McDonnell, 1977). The question as to whether language is a science that human beings are born with or whether it is a skill that is acquired is a complex one and not one in which all researchers are in agreement.Neither are researchers in agreement about whether animals withdraw the capability of language. To resolve these controversies we must look to both human and animal research.The linguistic relativity theor y known as the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis was developed by Benjamin Lee Whorf (a linguist and anthropologist) and Edward Sapir. The theory argues that language is a finite array of lexical and grammatical categories that group experiences into usable classes which vary across cultures just influence thought.The theory maintains that a concept cannot be understood without an appropriate word for that concept. To explore this theory and the animal language controversy we must starting signal accept that both animals and humans have the capacity for language. The next task then would be to determine whether that capacity is innate or acquired. A property which is innate is an instinctual behavior and most often one which one was born with. An innate or instinctual behavior is often associated with an organismsgenetic propensity to behave or react in a certain way.Innate language ability or our genetic formation, under the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis, would serve to limit the conceptual abil ity of an several(prenominal) for without words concepts could not be understood according to this hypothesis. There are numerous points which can serve to discredit this hypothesis.The interaction between genetic formation and behavior or reaction is an interesting one. Some researchers bring off that basic linguistic organization, or grammar, is a one, which is built into the human brain (McConnell, 1977). These researcher conceptualize that humans... ... is, inarguably, a tremendously important part of linguistic development and refinement. Obviously it is social interaction which determines the particulars of our language. It could be contended therefore that because animals have not been presented with the appropriate remark which would require the refinement of their language, they have not refined language skills to the degree which is evidenced in humans. This does not mean that animals are incapable of language, or that they neediness an understanding of concepts due to their insufficiency of words for those concepts, just that they presently lack the degree of refinement which is observable in human language.BibliographyGrunwald, Lisa Jeff Goldberg and Stacey Be. (1993, 1 Jul).Discovery The direful Minds of Infants. Life.Huba, M.E. and S. Ramisetty-Mikler. (1995, 1 Sep). The speech communication skills and concepts of early and non-earlyReaders. Journal of Genetic Psychology.McConnell, James V. (1977). Understanding Human BehaviorAn Introduction to Psychology. Holt, Rinehart andWinston. New York.Murray, Linda A. (1996, Feb 1). Social Interaction and theDevelopment of wording and Cognition. British Journalof Psychology. The Origin Of Language Essay -- essays research papers fc There has been considerable historical discourse over the nature of language. Most contend that thought and language are two interrelated criteria. Just how these criteria relate to the controversy over whether animals have language capabilities and ev en more specifically to the Sapir-Whorf human language thought debate, however, is not always clear. From a human context we know that language is a skill which allows us to communicate our thoughts to others and in so doing to attain desired "biological, cognitive, and social/behavioral feedback" (McDonnell, 1977). The question as to whether language is a skill that human beings are born with or whether it is a skill that is acquired is a complex one and not one in which all researchers are in agreement.Neither are researchers in agreement about whether animals have the capability of language. To resolve these controversies we must look to both human and animal research.The linguistic relativity theory known as the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis was developed by Benjamin Lee Whorf (a linguist and anthropologist) and Edward Sapir. The theory argues that language is a finite array of lexical and grammatical categories that group experiences into usable classes which vary across cultu res only when influence thought.The theory maintains that a concept cannot be understood without an appropriate word for that concept. To explore this theory and the animal language controversy we must rootage accept that both animals and humans have the capacity for language. The next task then would be to determine whether that capacity is innate or acquired. A device characteristic which is innate is an instinctual behavior and most often one which one was born with. An innate or instinctual behavior is often associated with an organismsgenetic propensity to behave or react in a certain way.Innate language ability or our genetic makeup, under the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis, would serve to limit the conceptual ability of an individual for without words concepts could not be understood according to this hypothesis. There are numerous points which can serve to discredit this hypothesis.The interaction between genetic makeup and behavior or reaction is an interesting one. Some researc hers contend that basic linguistic organization, or grammar, is a one, which is built into the human brain (McConnell, 1977). These researcher rely that humans... ... is, inarguably, a tremendously important part of linguistic development and refinement. Obviously it is social interaction which determines the particulars of our language. It could be contended therefore that because animals have not been presented with the appropriate stimulus which would require the refinement of their language, they have not refined language skills to the degree which is evidenced in humans. This does not mean that animals are incapable of language, or that they lack an understanding of concepts due to their lack of words for those concepts, just that they presently lack the degree of refinement which is observable in human language.BibliographyGrunwald, Lisa Jeff Goldberg and Stacey Be. (1993, 1 Jul).Discovery The painful Minds of Infants. Life.Huba, M.E. and S. Ramisetty-Mikler. (1995, 1 Sep) . TheLanguage skills and concepts of early and non-earlyReaders. Journal of Genetic Psychology.McConnell, James V. (1977). Understanding Human BehaviorAn Introduction to Psychology. Holt, Rinehart andWinston. New York.Murray, Linda A. (1996, Feb 1). Social Interaction and theDevelopment of Language and Cognition. British Journalof Psychology.